Although greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and marine plastic reduction have been recognised as essential factors for the sustainability performance of waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation tool for quantifying the environmental, social and economic impacts caused by WTE projects. To fill the gap, this study developed a natural capital-based sustainability assessment (NCSA) framework for evaluating the sustainability of WTE projects. The merits of the NCSA framework include (1) the quantification of the benefits caused by the avoidance of marine plastic pollution by WTE projects, and (2) an inclusive sustainability evaluation framework that holistically assesses the environmental, social and economic performance associated with GHG and marine plastic reduction. The NCSA framework has been demonstrated in the case study on the Sanya WTE Project. The results showed that the Sanya WTE Project emitted 265,376 tonnes of CO2e of GHG and prevented 28,242 - 75,312 tonnes of marine plastic during the study period, which is equivalent to a net benefit of CNY41.90 million - 464.45 million. The case study demonstrated that the NCSA framework is a comprehensive evaluation tool that provides clear and sound results for guiding decisions towards sustainable waste management and the overall sustainability of cities.
Keywords:
Waste-to-energy; MSW management; greenhouse gas assessment; marine plastic pollution; blue economy; natural capital assessment; sustainability assessment
Reference List:
Alfaro-Núñez A, Astorga D, Cáceres-Farías L, Bastidas L, Villegas CS, Macay KC and Christensen JH (2021). Microplastic pollution in seawater and marine organisms across the Tropical Eastern Pacific and Galápagos. Scientific Reports, 11, article no. 6424.
Anshassi M, Sackles H and Townsend TG (2021). A review of LCA assumptions impacting whether landfilling or incineration results in less greenhouse gas emissions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 174, article no. 105810.
Bateman IJ and Mace GM (2020). The natural capital framework for sustainably efficient and equitable decision making. Nature Sustainability, 3, pp. 776- 783.
Beylot A, Muller S, Descat M, Ménard Y and Villeneuve J (2018). Life cycle assessment of the French municipal solid waste incineration sector. Waste Management, 80, pp. 144-153.
Brunner PH and Rechberger H (2015). Waste to energy - key element for sustainable waste management. Waste Management, Special Thematic Issue: Waste-to-Energy Processes and Technologies, 37, pp. 3-12.
Chen YC (2018). Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions and energy recovery from municipal and industrial solid waste using waste-to-energy technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, pp. 262-269.
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2019). Application of the natural capital approach to the marine environment to aid decisionmaking. London: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs.
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2021). Enabling a Natural Capital Approach - Guidance. [online]. Available at: . [Accessed on 18 October 2022].
European Environment Agency (EEA) (2022). CICES - Structure of CICES. [online]. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services. Available at: . [Accessed on 20 October 2022].
Evode N, Qamar SA, Bilal M, Barceló D and Iqbal HMN (2021). Plastic waste and its management strategies for environmental sustainability. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 4, article no. 100142.
Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (2021). Microplastics affect global nutrient cycle and oxygen levels in the ocean: GEOMAR study points to possible major changes in the marine ecosystem. [online]. ScienceDaily. Available at: . [Accessed on 15 July 2022].
Haines-Young R and Potschin MB (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services. [online]. Available at: . [Accessed on 18 October 2023].
He P, Chen L, Shao L, Zhang H and Lü F (2019). Municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill: A source of microplastics? -Evidence of microplastics in landfill leachate. Water Research, 159, pp. 38-45.
HM Treasury (2022). The Green Book - Central Government Guidance on Appraisal and Evaluation. [online]. Available at: . [Accessed on 18 October 2023].
Hoang NH and Fogarassy C (2020). Sustainability Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste Management System for Hanoi (Vietnam) -Why to Choose the ‘Waste-to-Energy’ Concept. Sustainability, 12, article no. 1085.
Huang L, Tan Y, Song X, Huang X, Wang H, Zhang S, Dong J and Chen R (2003). The Status of the Ecological Environment and a Proposed Protection Strategy in Sanya Bay, Hainan Island, China. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 47, pp. 180-186.
Islam KMN (2018). Municipal solid waste to energy generation: An approach for enhancing climate cobenefits in the urban areas of Bangladesh. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, pp. 2472-2486.
Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M, Andrady A, Narayan R and Law KL (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347, pp. 768-771.
Kaza S, Yao L, Bhada-Tata P and Van Woerden F (2018). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Washington: World Bank.
Khan I and Kabir Z (2020). Waste-to-energy generation technologies and the developing economies: A multi-criteria analysis for sustainability assessment. Renewable Energy, 150, pp. 320-333.
Law KL, Starr N, Siegler TR, Jambeck JR, Mallos NJ and Leonard GH (2020). The United States’ contribution of plastic waste to land and ocean. Science Advances, 6, eabd0288.
Leach K, Grigg A, O’Connor B, Brown C, Vause J, Gheyssens J, Weatherdon L, Halle M, Burgess ND, Fletcher R, Bekker S, King S and Jones M (2019). A common framework of natural capital assets for use in public and private sector decision making. Ecosystem Services, 36, article no. 100899.
Lin C and Nakamura S (2019). Approaches to solving China’s marine plastic pollution and CO2 emission problems. Economic Systems Research, 31, pp. 143- 157.
Lu YT, Lee YM and Hong CY (2017). Inventory Analysis and Social Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Waste-to-Energy Incineration in Taiwan. Sustainability, 9, article no. 1959.
Makarichi L, Jutidamrongphan W and Techato K (2018). The evolution of waste-to-energy incineration: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91, pp. 812-821.
Mayer F, Bhandari R and Gäth S (2019). Critical review on life cycle assessment of conventional and innovative waste-to-energy technologies. Science of The Total Environment, 672, pp. 708-721.
Milutinović B, Stefanović G, Dassisti M, Marković D and Vučković G (2014). Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model. Energy, 74, pp. 190-201.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MOHURD) (2021). China Urban-Rural Construction Statistical Yearbook 2020. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development.
Ramachandra TV, Bharath HA, Kulkarni G and Han SS (2018). Municipal solid waste: Generation, composition and GHG emissions in Bangalore, India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, pp. 1122-1136.
S&P Global (2022). China Data: Carbon Emission Allowance price at $8.76/mtCO2e May 27. [online]. Available at: . [Accessed on 2 October 2022].
Statista (2022). MSW generation shares worldwide by select country. [online]. Available at: . [Accessed on 1 July 2022].
Sun J, Zhu ZR, Li WH, Yan X, Wang LK, Zhang L, Jin J, Dai X and Ni BJ (2021). Revisiting Microplastics in Landfill Leachate: Unnoticed Tiny Microplastics and Their Fate in Treatment Works. Water Research, 190, article no. 116784.
Tabata T (2013). Waste-to-energy incineration plants as greenhouse gas reducers: a case study of seven Japanese metropolises. Waste Management & Research, 31, pp. 1110-1117.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2016). Marine plastic debris and microplastics - Global lessons and research to inspire action and guide policy change. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2017a). CDM TOOL03 Methodological tool: Tool to calculate project or leakage CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion (v.3.0). [online]. Available at: . [Accessed on 2 October 2022].
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2017b). CDM TOOL04 Methodological tool: Emissions from solid waste disposal sites (v.8.0). [online]. Available at: . [Accessed on 2 October 2022].
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2021). CDM ACM0022 Largescale Consolidated Methodology: Alternative waste treatment processes (v.3.0). [online]. Available at: . [Accessed on 2 October 2022].
Verster C and Bouwman H (2020). Land-based sources and pathways of marine plastics in a South African context. South African Journal of Science, 116, pp. 25-33.
Wang Y, Yan Y, Chen G, Zuo J, Yan B and Yin P (2017). Effectiveness of waste-to-energy approaches in China: from the perspective of greenhouse gas emission reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, pp. 99-105.
Yi S, Jang YC and An AK (2018). Potential for energy recovery and greenhouse gas reduction through waste-to-energy technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, pp. 503-511.
